There are a lot of people opting out of children's vaccination these days, mostly because the greater fear is the unknown rather than the devastating illnesses (now largely eradicated) that vaccines protect against.
It's sad, because it shows that widespread information (via the internet) does not always mean truth floats to the surface. As described in a Wired article about this anti-vaccine movement...
An Epidemic of Fear: "The bottom line: Pseudo-science preys on well-intentioned people who, motivated by love for their kids, become vulnerable to one of the world’s oldest professions. Enter the snake-oil salesman."
How do you address the myths this salesman creates? After all, vaccines (with or without the thimerosal preservative) are not linked with autism.
To be clear, there is no credible evidence to indicate that any of this is true. None. Twelve epidemiological studies have found no data that links the MMR (measles/mumps/rubella) vaccine to autism; six studies have found no trace of an association between thimerosal (a preservative containing ethylmercury that has largely been removed from vaccines since 20011) and autism, and three other studies have found no indication that thimerosal causes even subtle neurological problems.
The science is clear, but the public debate is far from it, no thanks to a media establishment more interested in controversy than truth.
And the big losers are the children, who are now being needlessly exposed to completely preventable diseases. That's why vaccination should be required. Because it's irresponsible of government to allow people to risk their children's lives based on pseudoscience.
We mandate seatbelt use and car seats. This is no different.