To put this more succinctly: any serious long-term deficit plan will spend about 1% of its time on the discretionary budget, 1% on Social Security, and 98% on healthcare. Any proposal that doesn't maintain approximately that ratio shouldn't be considered serious. The Simpson-Bowles plan, conversely, goes into loving detail about cuts to the discretionary budget and Social Security but turns suddenly vague and cramped when it gets to Medicare. That's not serious.
Critiquing the rationality of public policy, ruminating on modern life,
and exposing my inner nerd.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Thumbs Down to the "Attention Deficit Commission"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment