The recent conversation over energy legislation is a good example, and I am ashamed to say that I've been guilty of it with regard to the House Waxman-Markey climate legislation. But here's a great refutation of that point, from a Grist chat with energy analyst Trevor Houser:
"Our litmus test for legislation that will fundamentally alter the behavior of the U.S. energy sector -- a $2.2 trillion part of the U.S. economy -- for the next 40 years is whether or not it can be kept under 100 pages?"Sometimes wanting simple is just being simple. Brilliant.
1 comment:
I agree that litmus tests are often too naive - no reason to diss a bill *just* b/c the page count is high - but I do not agree that "wanting simple is sometimes just being simple". Although that sentiment is nicely (and simply) put.
Post a Comment